Rehabilitating Big Brother
Are we being a little too squeamish about 21st-century surveillance?
Nobody objects to a cop or a security guard keeping an eye on things. But when you replace the human eye with a camera, civil libertarians howl.
Why?
Chicago
has used surveillance cameras at government buildings, train stations, and intersections for a few years. Milwaukee wants to put surveillance cameras in some stores, and Baltimore County, Maryland, requires large malls to install cameras in parking lots. Said Baltimore County Councilman Kevin Kamenetz:
We require shopping centers to put railings on stairs and install sprinkler systems for public safety. This is a proper next step.
But is it just a benign and necessary step for keeping us safer and more secure, or is it the proverbial slippery slope?
In Houston, the police chief wants to take it a step further — requiring cameras not only in streets and shopping malls, but in apartment complexes and on the grounds of private homes. The chief gave the classic justification:
I know a lot of people are concerned about Big Brother, but my response to that is, if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?
Ok, pointing a camera at my front door to watch my comings and goings is a little creepy. But what's wrong with putting cameras in more public places — anywhere you would expect to see a cop stationed?
And why stop with cameras? It's now possible to implant tiny, inexpensive transmitter chips into a person to identify him or track his whereabouts. Is that also creepy, or just good, 21st-century common sense?
Police use fingerprints and DNA to determine if a person was at a crime scene. No one objects. Why not go a step further? Instead of using part of a criminal's body as evidence against him, police would simply be using a piece of technology implanted into his body.
The idea of implanting chips into people to identify and track them is chilling. But after seeing the abuses that the Bush administration has gotten away with in the name of safety and security, I have no doubt that the practice will someday become acceptable and routine.
And besides, if you're not doing anything wrong, why worry about it?
Cross-posted today at Blognonymous.
Comments
You wonder who's going to watch that stuff, you know? I mean, if everybody is their own TV show, 24 hours a day, who's going to have time to watch anyone else?
Posted by: Neil Shakespeare | February 27, 2006 03:25 AM