Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory
It looks like the Mayor of Kabul is starting to lose control even over Kabul:
The fighting [in Afghanistan] is spreading to places once relatively safe, including the capital and the western and northern parts of the country...
In Kabul, where suicide bombs have killed almost 50 people in two weeks, foreigners are increasingly ordered into "lockdown."
It seems the Taliban, who we defeated six years ago, "never evaporated into thin air." And they're getting stronger:
"One reason for their renewed strength is that the people are more or less amenable to what they are doing and maybe some of the (NATO) bombardments have not been very wisely executed."
Translation: A few too many dead babies and women.
But according to one international observer, the news isn't all bad:
"It's important to emphasise: I don't think the Taliban themselves are wildly popular...I don't think people want Taliban times back."
Or is it? The observer continued:
"[The Taliban's resurgence] is a broad dissatisfaction with what is happening in the country now."
Translation: Compared to us, the Taliban is starting to look pretty good.
Comments
Now we have an Australian election date - Nov 24 - it will be interesting to see how Afghanistan rates as an issue.
Our first casualty has just been delivered home and recent polling suggests 50% opposed to the action before that death and the election.
Posted by: Dennis Cartledge | October 13, 2007 10:00 PM
I was just reading up on your election system, and learned voting is mandatory. Is that actually enforced? Sounds like it could be expensive.
Posted by: abi | October 14, 2007 08:52 AM
voting is compulsory, and fines are levied for registered (enrolled) voters who fail to vote.
On the other hand there is no legal requirement to enroll and the law has been changed to make it difficult for first time voters to enroll. If they failed to do so before wednesday, when the writ is proclaimed, they miss out.
Howard is trying to limit the young voters who oppose him.
But studies I've done don't really show any significant benefits of compulsory voting. At most there is about 10% turnout difference generally.
Posted by: Dennis Cartledge | October 14, 2007 02:40 PM
Thanks for the info, Cartledge. It's wierd, tho. You are required to vote, but not register. Anyway, here's hoping Howard and his party get the boot.
Posted by: abi | October 14, 2007 04:58 PM