![]() |
|||||
Compromising Health CarePublished December 12, 1993 in North Shore Sunday. First the
good news: We're no longer arguing over
whether to adopt a national health care plan – we're just arguing over the
plan's details. The bad
news is the man behind the plan is President Clinton, aka Captain Compromise. Clinton's
willingness to backpeddle showed up early in issues like gays in the military
and sending troops to Bosnia. Then there
was the BTU tax, which he insisted was dear to him right up to the day he
compromised it out of existence. Saying he
compromised in Somalia and Haiti is being polite. Even when
smoking dope, he compromised by puffing and not inhaling. And this
is the man who is bringing the US its long-overdue national health care
plan. It's been said that by the time Clinton
finishes compromising on this issue, the health plan will be reduced to about a
dozen kindly grandmothers traveling around the country kissing boo-boos. Clinton so
badly wants to pass a health care plan – any health care plan – that he
compromised the plan right from the start, devising a politically palatable
health plan rather than a first-rate one. Clinton's
plan is based on "managed competition." In a perfect world, competition between insurers is supposed to
drive premiums down and quality up. But
in the real world, competition means cutting costs, and often that means
cutting quality. Where do you cut
quality in health care? Insurers
have already found ways. Right now,
insurers can restrict the treatment your doctor thinks you need, or determine how
long you can stay in the hospital (kicking you out "quicker and
sicker," as the saying goes). The
first rule of medicine is "Do no harm." The second rule is fast becoming "Treat 'em and street
'em." With the
flexibility insurers will lose under Clinton's health plan, insurers will have
to hunt even harder for ways to cut costs.
I don't know about you, but I'm not real comfortable with my insurer
wheeling and dealing with hospitals, scratching for bargains with labs, or
peeking over my doctor's shoulder. When
I need tests, I don't want my doctor sending me someplace called The Radiology
Barn, or Yvette's Hair and X-ray Emporium, because that's who the insurer has a
deal with. In the
"managed" part of managed competition, government is supposed to
control medical coverages and costs.
But keep in mind that Congress just passed a law that was supposed to
lower cable TV bills. Of course, my
cable bill immediately went up. Managed
competition? Don't believe it. Among its
other problems, the Clinton plan is too complex, given its multiple coverage
packages, multiple payers, and multiple versions between states. Instead of all this, Clinton should have
applied the KISS principle – keep it simple, stupid. In fact, this president should recite a litany of self-admonitions
each morning, like:
Private
insurers have no place in an efficiently-run national health care plan, due to
the cost, complexity, and self-interest insurers add to the mix. Instead, we should adopt a single-payer
plan, like the one proposed by Representative Jim McDermott of Washington. But a
single-payer plan is a hard sell in this country. That's why Clinton proposed a multi-payer plan (a leader leads, a
compromiser compromises).
Single-payer is a hard sell because of America's two remaining dirty
words – the T-word and the S-word. In a
single-payer plan, we essentially insure ourselves through taxes, like Medicare
insures older Americans. But health care
has to be paid for somehow, whether through taxes or insurance premiums. Better to pay through taxes and eliminate the
cost and bother of all the middle men. Then
there's the dreaded S-word. Of all the
proposed health plans, single-payer is the one that most sounds like (gulp) socialized
medicine. I can hear Rush now –
"I mean, come on, over in Russia they're finally burying Lenin, for pete's
sake, and here we're talking socialism?" But lots
of people support a single-payer plan.
It's not the radical, unworkable idea that some would have you
believe. If you think you and your
family deserve a quality health care plan, let your Congressperson know. It's not too late for the McDermott plan,
which has about 90 House co-sponsors.
But if Clinton's plan becomes law, the world's only remaining superpower
will be stuck with a health care plan that's inefficient, confusing, and above
all, compromised. | |||||